Evolution: Science or Philosophy

[cheeseburger]

Actually neither side has done anything for either argument.

Well, it's a little hard to 'do something' for one side of the argument if you don't read the argument. Sorry, but taking a megaphone and yelling down your nose isn't legal. Take the time to read a scientific article, or any of the bajillions of popular science evolution books.

So I propose there is still one idea/theory/supposition out there that noone is intelligent enough to have found yet.

I dunno buddy, are you calling all evolutionary biologists morons? I don't see you with a PhD and 20 years of experience. Even if you did have one, watch your mouth.

And then i say if we don't understand it why do we try to put in false theories and think they are the answer until they are disproven..
That is what creates all the arguments.

Why is argument bad? Argument, if done in a non-condescending and academic manner, is actually very valuable for both sides. It allows them to try and explain their side - which reinforces their theories by explaining it to others, and it allows for an exchange/rebuttal of ideas.

Unfortunately, this particular debate is a little one sided (what with there being myriads of scientific articles on evolution), but it's still interesting (for me).

I'm not trying to be rude, or singling you out for a personal attack. But seriously, don't go around calling people 'not intelligent enough' without an arsenal of proof.

I do not have to present an alternative, my point in this thread is that evolution falls short as science. The fact that I do not have an explanation does not make evolution true.

This attitude I like.

[Rhabbi]

Unfortunately, this particular debate is a little one sided (what with there being myriads of scientific articles on evolution), but it's still interesting (for me).

there is a growing body of scientific evidence and articles from other points of view, so it not as one sided as it used to be.