If the extradition act is so equal then why are both sides of the house in favour of a rethink? The only people that know anything as to why the treaty was looked at in 2003 was Bush...out of office....Blair....out of office.... and David Blunkett...and he can’t remember damn all....very convenient. It was signed by a blind man before the UK parliament was consulted, now if that was not underhanded then what is. The only way they could get it passed was by doing it in secret, and that is abuse of paliamentry privlages. It could be argued that it was the, Blind leading the even blinder.
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/jul/25ukus.htm
Be well IAN 2411