Yes, indeed! :-))
Which is just another way to say that someone was chosen for pay for someone else's ideas and greed.But in the past, in many cultures, slavery was not only acceptable but an economic necessity.
'Economic neccessity' is just a manipulative expression. Pretty much like 'you cannot make an omelet without breaking eggs'. But it is always somebody else's egss, and all it means is 'I am going to destroy you for me benefit.'