ok you are wrong on one point the genocide of native american civilized tribes was not justifiable. even at the time it was not seen as justifiable. the congress at the time censured andrew jackson for disobeying the law. iw was illegal at the time not just now looking back. further the supreme court of the day ruled in favor of the native americans you all dont get it. it was the decision of andrew jackson not america not the supreme courtnot the congress. no one but modern americans and others see it as justifiable. the people of the time condemned it all over america. the supreme court condemned it the congress censured him. andrew jackson by any definnition was a terrorist. and he was seen to be a brute by his own contemporaries not by me. he was seen to be breaking the law by his own supreme court he was seen to be reprehensible by his own congress why do we want to justify him when his contemporaries condemned him

as for terrorism how can u consider a group calling in a death threat to a tv station terrorism while saying threatening to burn down a church full oif kids is not terrorism where is the logic in that|? is terrorism only valid for a certain hue of people in a certian era, bullshit