While that is the standard and accepted argument for preventing the situation, it does not stand to test. Soldiers do not die for a cause nor, really, for their country. They die for the guy in the next foxhole. This bond is strongest in those that have actually gone into harms way, likely strongest among Marines. You count on that "other" soldier to keep you safe. If that means they fire "danger close" they are expected to do so. All uniforms know this!

Quote Originally Posted by ian 2411 View Post
I think the point that steelish is trying to make is this, if there are two gay men on the front line and one of them is a specialist. Then the speicialists boyfriend, mate whatever is out in the open, but in close combat with the enamy. His borfreind has to put a rocket so close that it not only kills thirty enemy and saves sixty troops, but at the same time puts his mate in the kill zone, it will have an effect on the specialist mate to carry out his task. I believe this to be true, and you have to think vanilla to think gay in that scenario, it is sad but a possibility that a lot of people would die for the sake of one persons love. That is the scenario that the military chiefs are afraid of, and so to are the streight troops fighting beside the gay lovers. I have tried to make that as clear as i can. Please dont for one minute think that i am anti gay, becaue there are places for gays in the forces, but not in a combat batallian, because life and death depend on cool heads.

Regards ian 2411