Quote Originally Posted by fetishdj View Post
I think a lot of what is said above is spot on... being vulnerable to emotions and things is a human trait. Without that susceptibility we would not be human. Being broken is independent of whether you are submissive or not (evidence for that - I think we have had a range of responses to this thread from some saying they are broken and a sub and others saying they are not broken and a sub) but it is not independent of whether you are human or not.

Snowflake says that she needs her submission to cope with her problems. A question I would pose to any who have this feeling is: Do you think you would still be submissive if you were not broken? If a magical cure for all your woes were available and you took it, would you then leave your Master/Mistress and lead a 'normal' life as a vanilla? I think this question is the crux of the matter - direct cause/effect relationship between psychological state and submission or happenstance?

Thank you for sharing that hearfelt and honest post, Snowflake. And I am sure you know that as well as your two Masters (two! Extreme luck!) there are those here on the forums who are happy to talk you through any woes you may have - either in public or privately. The same goes to anyone who posts here...
Thanks hun for your kind words...

Yes i would still be a submissive ..but i don't think as submissive as i am now.. i wouldn't have to lean so hard on them for approval or justification on my doings so much.. i would be more trusting in my self to please them..

Although it helps that i am also very passive and shy ..and always have been and i truly love to make others happy.. So yes the submissive would stay... but i would not need so much direction to keep in a normal day...

Whispers it takes two of them to keep me going ..giggles.. and yes i am very lucky...

Just my opinion

hugs
snow