If those who were oppressed, deported, or otherwise inconvenienced (I realize that is a huge understatement) are still alive, then yes. Find a way to recompense them for their losses.

While there may be some justification for making some sort of reparation to the surviving children of those who were so treated... as a way of getting the family back to it's original status... or as a way of acknowledging the wrong-doing... in general I am against making reparations for bad deeds done long ago.

Reparations have the dual purpose of compensation and punishment. So who is being punished? Is it the families descended from slave owners? Or is it the many many families that immigrated to this country long after slavery was abolished? Should the descendents of staunch abolishionists be effected? The descendents of Union soldiers?

I am much more aware of reparation issues regarding WWII detainees in Europe (Jews, Poles, Gypsies, etc.,) than I am with regard to the Chineese articles... but anything past recompensing the first generation just doesn't make sense.

Where do you draw the line?

Should the Jews and Muslims be recompensed by Spain for the Spanish Inquisition? Should Christians be recompensed by Turkey for the actions of the Ottomans? Europeans by the Scandinavian countries, for the ravages of the Vikings?

Everyone has history and most histories, somewhere, sometime, involve being the oppressor and being oppressed. We need to learn the lessons of the past, look to stopping oppression in the present, and stop fretting about "getting even."