Dear Mr. Fox,

Thank you for clearing up any confusion caused by mere semantics, e.g. "intelligence BREEDS Kinky behavior". Seems that I committed a rush to judgment (over those who naturally basked in the self-satisfaction that their kink made them smarter than the average Joe, or Jane). Apologies for this mis-thinking.

To Fox's credit his most recent post does admit that their is no scientific basis for his fine poll, and that it is just something for this easily biased audience. Curtis says much the same thing in his post, only relates certain prejudices to reviewers.

Experience has personally shown that reviewers not only take the time to post their views, but are varied in their tastes and dislikes. This latter observation would seem to fly in the face of all being of the same ilk.

A conundrum indeed!