Originally Posted by Dslave
It seems that you and I are just bound to disagree on these things.
I don't see any difference in level of commitment between a submissive and a slave. The two simply choose to serve in different ways.
In fact, an argument could easily be made that a slave is less comitted than a submissive is, because she doesn't actually have to make any decisions or take any responsibility for herself. She just has to obey and follow orders as they are given.
I don't know where the stigma that submissives are not as comitted as slaves are, but I certainly do not believe it to be a true one.
Incidentally, how does a slave trust her master with her life? This isn't the world of Gor. A slave isn't going to be put to death for disobedience or for being displeasing. A slave that is not happy with her master, or a master that is not happy with his slave, can walk out the door. If a slave worried that her life was in danger, why would she have become a slave to the person that caused that worry in her in the first place?