I just think that while the article was generally OK, the journalist portrayed to sub as being 'troubled' or 'not quite right' with their closing remarks. To me that does rather nail their colours to the mast. I'm only saying that without that, it would have been a more neutral, informative piece. To insinuate that the sub should seek her satisfactions elsewhere for a more full, satisfying life, dosen't acknowledge that what she is doing is fine; harms no-one; gives mutual pleasure to her and her man and is their way of expressing themselves to each other and enjoying each other. I'd have been happier with a more accepting conclusion.