TG, I can only ask that you look at what you said.

“So, what you're really saying is... that there's no trust in your relationship? Why else would you have to prove that you are carrying out his orders?”

“I responded to the nature of the statement, not to personally attack, but to advise if there was a potential problem."

Well, TG. Look at it again. Do the first two sentences LOOK like advice? Or a personal attack? If that is your way of giving advice I would suggest you take a course in conflict resolution.




“I don't feel the need to have visual evidence of my tasks being done. I can simply assign a writing assignment or a reading assignment with a summary to be written and the written assignment is evidence enough that the task was completed.”

So .. you don’t feel the need to have visual evidence … the written assignment is evidence. WHAT ?????

Your argument is totally illogical. To have total trust in your sub, surely FF would have done the assignment, told you she had done it and .. nothing. You would not need or wish to see it. You would trust her.

This is where I believe you confuse a web cam with some peep show. The use of a cam is no different to any other piece of technical equipment (email, IM, telephone, snail mail, etc) except in degree.

I doubt there has EVER been an online relationship where a sentence along the lines of “I would love to see that/show you” has not been written. A cam allows this. Trust is NOT an issue.