You misunderstood. Bacterial walls are made of lipoproteins (mostly grease) which are dissolved by soap. Antibacterial soaps are a joke only in the sense that it is a pleonasm. All soaps are, by definition, antibacterial. And yes, soap does kill a whole lot of 'germs". I won't have any chemist tell me the opposite. I have a B.Sc. in biochemistry and a M.Sc. in microbiology and the "clean/dirty fingers on a TSA plate" experiment is old as microbiology itself. This question is not in the chemistry's department. A chemisty Ph.D. should shut up on this, otherwise it's like asking a psychology professor to express his opinion on whether the construction of a given bridge will stand tornadoes.I have a friend that is a doctor of chemistry. And he's still going to school for who knows what. He told me that washing your hands doesn’t kill hardly any germs. Anti bacterial soaps are a joke to say the least
Bottom line: soaps are very effective ''germ" killers (if this is to be understood as bacteria and viruses). The NHI says so and it's every doctor's proven way of avoiding serial infection when going from a patient to another. With proper contact (i.e.: what matters the most is time), soap gets rid of more than 95%+ of the common bacteria found on hands as well as most envelopped viruses.
Wrong again.Do either of you have an idea of how many people in this world give rim jobs? Millions! And if all of them died there would not be hardly any of the population left in this world. There are also a small group that are into scat and they don’t seem to be dropping dead every day. So your information is true about e-coli but yet the two don’t make sense
The human body can defend itself against bacteria and it often loses the war because of quantity. French kiss someone who has the flu and you'll get the virus. Chances are you won't develop it b/c your body can control it. French kiss 20 people with the flue... and you most likely will develop it. Quantity, I said.
Same thing b/w a rim job and eating shit. 80% of the shit is pure bacteria. 20% is made of fibers, dead cells, etc. Ingurgitating grams or hundreds of grams of bacteria is way different comparing to licking a zone infested with bacteria. Plus, in the 2nd case you also expose the bacteria to saliva which acts like an added defense, altough a mild one.
Bottom line: expect a much higher illness rate in toilets than in rim job givers. The two things don't quite compare because minimal infections quantity is an important variable in epidemiology.
By the way, E. coli is the correct way of writing it (The dot and the E/c capitalization are strictly non negociable).





Reply With Quote